AI in recruitment this, AI in recruitment that. There's been plenty of AI commentary written over the last couple of years, regarding AI-infused activity on both sides of the fence. On the candidate's side, AI models have been used for high touch, high volume application activity - hundreds sent in minutes. Prompts fed into models to produce structure and keywords explicitly designed to bypass the AI screening on the recruiter's side. AI coding tools enlisted by candidates to ace live coding exams.
Image
This activity seems to have accelerated steeply for recruiters in 2026. This survey indicates that more than 4 in 5 recruitment processes now rely on AI at some point in their process. The internet is awash with stories of AI bots conducting job interviews, AI bias - more qualified candidates filtered out because tools placed a greater keyword emphasis on compliance, rather than competence. Walls constructed, shields held aloft by both candidate and hiring manager - a vacuum of human interaction which only serves to slow, rather than expedite, the job hunting process.
Image
So what is the reason for the decline in entry-level opportunities in the UK? The reduction in graduate roles, the inexorable rise in number of graduates and competition, the serious adoption and introduction of AI within businesses and macro-economic conditions create a perfect storm. That's not the case, though, with Pareto - we have plenty of entry-level sales roles available.
Another trend that Pareto has bucked? Our involvement of AI in our hiring process. Contrary to businesses that have helped contribute to
Although human intervention will always be at the core of our hiring, in 2025 we partnered with an enterprise to introduce a light touch AI step to our hiring pathway for entry level and emerging talent. In addition to the positive candidate feedback, what does it actually mean for the employers that we partner with?